Twelve Approaches to Reincarnation and Karma
J Graf
It has been thought, by a few great individuals, that if you can
garner twelve perspectives on a particular subject, then you can
attain a significant understanding of the subject. This article
strives in that direction by presenting the dynamics of
reincarnation and karma from twelve different angles. The
thrust of the material presented here serves twofold: to help
elucidate the actual nature of reincarnation and karma, and to
answer to current voices during this materialistic phase of
human development who attempt, in vain, to deny its existence.
None of the materialist arguments hold any water, as can be seen
by reviewing the following twelve aspects of R and K.
1. The masterpiece scenario
If you wanted to design a system that would be a masterpiece, a
means of providing individuals with opportunity to fulfill their
potential, to keep growing and learning, and meeting themselves
with all their foibles and virtues, qualities and talents, vices
and shortfalls to improve on, and to ensure that all
participants could access awareness of their effects on others
(be it right away or, as seems to be more the case in our
current time, in the between-lives arena) - then you would come
up with the system that appears to be in play on Earth now - the
masterpiece of karma and reincarnation in which we live. Human
imagination has, thus far, been unable to come up with anything
remotely approaching this level of creationist expertise. This,
plus the conceptual reality of the R and K scenario in our
individual psyches (and in our collective psyche), not only
suggests that some kind of omniscient being created this
masterpiece, but also implies that the scenario has been fully
implemented in the fabric of our existence.
2. Experiment:
Take a moment to imagine the cessation of your "I". You can
imagine the physical body coming to an end, the dissolution of
the body. But can you do so with the "I"? The moment you try,
there is your "I" standing back looking for an imagined end to
itself. It can't be done* - inferring that the Ego lives on
after death.
*footnote: The "I" can be dissipated, in a sense, by one's own
efforts, or at least degraded and debilitated, through chronic
substance abuse, or through long term practice of a spiritual
path that espouses the dissolution of the ego (once an
appropriate experience for the soul during the ancient Indian
epoch, but now counter to the present leading edge of evolution
- the retention and enhancement of the "Ego" or I).
3. Multi-dimensional factors and future life progress.
There are times when an overly simplistic view of reincarnation
can be held. One aspect that helps over-ride this inclination is
to understand that thoughts don't carry on beyond a certain
stage of the death process, except as forces, whereas
enthusiasms, perceptions and feelings do pass into the next
life. That the conceptual life associated with an incarnation
dissipates means, for example, that a child who spoke the Greek
language in his/her past life does not learn the Greek language
any greater ease this life. Another perceptual shortfall
resides, for example, in the notion that a great musician must
have been a musician in a prior life, and now has simply
progressed to an advanced level. A more accurate perspective
views the emergence of a talent as a result of progress made in
a past life in another (but obliquely associated) arena of
development.
4. Proportion of brain utilized
Through reincarnation, we are given the opportunity to fulfill
our overall quest to become whole, fully evolved beings - a
quest that is utterly impossible in a single lifetime. It is
generally agreed that we use only 10-20% of our brain capacity.
This suggests that eventually we are going to use the whole
organ. Of course, to attain such a goal would only be feasible
over many lifetimes. The other side of the indication is that
when we die, we move into our deeper wisdom, we move out of our
temporary, life-long confinement, into our full capacity (use of
100% versus only 10-20%). We come to know, from an overview,
what our life was really about, and where we need to improve,
and can then determine where we are going, and with who, and the
particulars pertaining to the next life that we choose.
To view the whole article visit through the links below.
J Graf is the coordinator of Insight21 and Earth Vision -
doorways for the 21st Century.
About the author:
J Graf is the coordinator of Insight21 -
http://www.insight21.net and the sister site, Earth Vision -
http://www.evsite.net - - - doorways for the 21st Century.